Re: HEADS UP: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-07:01.jail
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:38:14 +1100
I'm not sure I understand that quite correct, where is this problem
appearing?
Other things:
tail is used in line 230: tail -r ${_fstab} | while read _device
_mountpt _rest; do
If the per-jail fstab is larger than 10 lines, which is the default of
tail to show, the remaining mountpoints will not be unmounted?
The default for the -r option is to display all of the input.
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: HEADS UP: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-07:01.jail
- From: Philipp Wuensche
- Re: HEADS UP: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-07:01.jail
- References:
- Re: HEADS UP: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-07:01.jail
- From: Philipp Wuensche
- Re: HEADS UP: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-07:01.jail
- Prev by Date: Re: HEADS UP: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-07:01.jail
- Next by Date: Permission denied by op
- Previous by thread: Re: HEADS UP: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-07:01.jail
- Next by thread: Re: HEADS UP: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-07:01.jail
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|