Re: HEADS UP: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-07:01.jail
- From: Philipp Wuensche <cryx-freebsd@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 04:40:59 +0100
Mark Andrews wrote:
I'm not sure I understand that quite correct, where is this problem
appearing?
Other things:
tail is used in line 230: tail -r ${_fstab} | while read _device
_mountpt _rest; do
If the per-jail fstab is larger than 10 lines, which is the default of
tail to show, the remaining mountpoints will not be unmounted?
The default for the -r option is to display all of the input.
Ah, didn't know that. Thanks for correcting me there.
greetings,
philipp
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: HEADS UP: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-07:01.jail
- From: Mark Andrews
- Re: HEADS UP: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-07:01.jail
- Prev by Date: HEADS UP: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-07:01.jail
- Next by Date: Re: HEADS UP: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-07:01.jail
- Previous by thread: Re: HEADS UP: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-07:01.jail
- Next by thread: Re: HEADS UP: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-07:01.jail
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|