Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-06:18.ppp

From: Colin Percival <cperciva@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:25:21 -0700

Stefan Bethke wrote:

ppp(4) or sppp(4)? Looking at the patch, it seems to be sppp(4), which
is (completely?) seperate from ppp(4), AFAIK.

Umm... I guess it's sppp(4) actually. NetBSD reported the problem to us
and I didn't realize that we had more than one version of Point-To-Point
Protocol. I'll send out a revised advisory once I'm sure I have all the
details right.

Colin Percival
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"

References:
- FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-06:18.ppp
  - From: FreeBSD Security Advisories
- Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-06:18.ppp
  - From: Stefan Bethke

Prev by Date: Does FreeBSD Will Support TPM Chip?
Next by Date: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-06:18.ppp [REVISED]
Previous by thread: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-06:18.ppp
Next by thread: Does FreeBSD Will Support TPM Chip?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Santas coming to town? When?
... Umm ... ... I am, AFAIK. ... > event from Borland Singapore's website. ...
(borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
Re: two public class in a single file
... AFAIK it is simply a convention - but i believe it is a good one, ... it actually makes you seperate different aspects of your program ... into seperate files ...
(comp.lang.java.programmer)