Re: atheros chips dangerous?
- From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:52:49 +0000
In message <20060811112511.T45647@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Robert Watson writes:
Something worth observing here is that many modern device drivers, especially
more complex cards with significant offload of functionality to the card, have
closed source components [...]
Not to mention regulatory requirements that the hardware not be configured
in certain parts of spectrum or power levels.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@xxxxxxxxxxx | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: atheros chips dangerous?
- From: Robert Watson
- Re: atheros chips dangerous?
- Prev by Date: Re: atheros chips dangerous?
- Next by Date: Re: atheros chips dangerous?
- Previous by thread: Re: atheros chips dangerous?
- Next by thread: Re: atheros chips dangerous?
- Index(es):