Re: seeding dev/random in 5.5
- From: "R. B. Rid***" <arne_woerner@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 08:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
--- fwaggle <fwaggle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
i have a question. perhaps i'm misunderstanding something with how SSHHmm... I was refering to the special problem of the beginner of this thread...
works, but how would having a "standard freebsd private key" benefit
anyone? if you wanted to impersonate a newly installed freebsd machine,
then all you'd need is that freely-available private key. plus you'd get
a bunch of clueless admins who had their machines installed by a
dedicated server provider, and who'd never change their host key, which
would effectively ruin SSH for their purposes.
As far as I understood him, he creates very special CDs, that are copied to the
to-be-updated-box, that is buried very deeply in a computing centre.
Those CDs may contain his special install-host-key without the problems u
describe...
unless i've seriously missed the boat somewhere (it's happened before!)Hmm... But then he would have the problem with a more complicated operation
i think a better solution would still be random key generation with a
nice little option to email the key signature somewhere that the new
admin could pick it up. it's still fraught with impersonation danger for
the paranoid, but imo it's a better idea than having a not-so-private
key on install.
procedure, which has to be translated into hollandish-language (which is
astonishingly quite similar to Africaans)...
-Arne
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: seeding dev/random in 5.5
- From: fwaggle
- Re: seeding dev/random in 5.5
- Prev by Date: Re: seeding dev/random in 5.5
- Next by Date: atheros chips dangerous?
- Previous by thread: Re: seeding dev/random in 5.5
- Next by thread: Re: seeding dev/random in 5.5
- Index(es):