Re: Any ongoing effort to port /etc/rc.d/pf_boot, /etc/pf.boot.conf from NetBSD ?
- From: des@xxxxxx (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
- Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 23:05:27 +0200
Daniel Hartmeier <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Hence, a "default block" switch or compile time option _within_ pf is
not going to make any difference.
Sure it will, if pf is compiled into the kernel or loaded by the BTX
loader.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@xxxxxx
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Any ongoing effort to port /etc/rc.d/pf_boot, /etc/pf.boot.conf from NetBSD ?
- From: Daniel Hartmeier
- Re: Any ongoing effort to port /etc/rc.d/pf_boot, /etc/pf.boot.conf from NetBSD ?
- References:
- Re: Any ongoing effort to port /etc/rc.d/pf_boot, /etc/pf.boot.conf from NetBSD ?
- From: Ari Suutari
- Re: Any ongoing effort to port /etc/rc.d/pf_boot, /etc/pf.boot.conf from NetBSD ?
- From: Daniel Hartmeier
- Re: Any ongoing effort to port /etc/rc.d/pf_boot, /etc/pf.boot.conf from NetBSD ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Any ongoing effort to port /etc/rc.d/pf_boot, /etc/pf.boot.conf from NetBSD ?
- Next by Date: Re: Any ongoing effort to port /etc/rc.d/pf_boot, /etc/pf.boot.conf from NetBSD ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Any ongoing effort to port /etc/rc.d/pf_boot, /etc/pf.boot.conf from NetBSD ?
- Next by thread: Re: Any ongoing effort to port /etc/rc.d/pf_boot, /etc/pf.boot.conf from NetBSD ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
