Re: Integrity checking NANOBSD images
- From: Mike Tancsa <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 16:52:11 -0400
At 04:34 PM 11/07/2006, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> >
> With respect to prepending a random salt to the image, can you expand
> what you mean ?
>
It means that every time you want to checksum it, you send some
random bits to be prepended to the image, then compute the
checksum(s). You then do the same (with the same salt) on a
trusted host and compare the results.
OK, but that implies I have a copy of the image locally. We do on occasion make modifications to the config in the field, and sending back a 512MB image over dialup would be difficult for this deployment.
---Mike
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: Integrity checking NANOBSD images
- From: Chuck Swiger
- Re: Integrity checking NANOBSD images
- From: Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Integrity checking NANOBSD images
- From: Mike Tancsa
- Re: Integrity checking NANOBSD images
- From: Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: Integrity checking NANOBSD images
- Prev by Date: Re: Integrity checking NANOBSD images
- Next by Date: Re: Integrity checking NANOBSD images
- Previous by thread: Re: Integrity checking NANOBSD images
- Next by thread: Re: Integrity checking NANOBSD images
- Index(es):