Re: Anyone running ntop on FBSD5.4

Remco Bressers wrote:

If you are running ntop on 5.4, what compile options?
Use ports version? Or surgefile tarball?

It makes a great security forensics tools, but I can't get it to stop
segfaulting.Was wondering if anyone found a fix for it.

I had the same problems on FreeBSD 5.4. Ntop keeps segfaulting. After an
upgrade to 6.0-RELEASE it works flawlessly.
No clue what the problem was :o).

I had this same problem as well. disable ipv6 or tcp6 using the ntop flags found in the manual page (man 8 ntop) worked well for me.

Jason M
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Anyone running ntop on FBSD5.4
    ... Use ports version? ... Or surgefile tarball? ... It makes a great security forensics tools, but I can't get it to stop ... segfaulting.Was wondering if anyone found a fix for it. ...
    (FreeBSD-Security)
  • Anyone running ntop on FBSD5.4
    ... If you are running ntop on 5.4, what compile options? ... Use ports version? ... Or surgefile tarball? ... It makes a great security forensics tools, but I can't get it to stop ...
    (FreeBSD-Security)
  • RE: syslog traffic analyzers
    ... >> you could run ntop on each of those machines to generate the ... >> flow data and send it to a central location for processing. ... use the byte counters in iptables. ... will find the activity regardless of the ports used. ...
    (Fedora)
  • RE: syslog traffic analyzers
    ... Ntop can group them by port/service but ... > will find the activity regardless of the ports used. ... But ntop would still be overkill if that's all you ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: Ntop on 6.0
    ... > I installed ntop 3.2_1 from the ports on a machine running FBSD 6.0. ... > appeared to install fine and seems OK when I start it. ...
    (freebsd-questions)