Re: Integrating ProPolice/SSP into FreeBSD
- From: Steve Kargl <sgk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 16:02:25 -0700
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 06:35:54PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
How does this compare to GCC 4.x mudflap feature? I do not plan to
include Propolice patch into base system any time soon and will object
anyone trying to do so due to future maintenance headaches this will
inevitably create. GCC 4.1.1 import is in the works though and should be
available shortly.
At one time mudflap would lead to internal compiler errors
on amd64. I haven't tried it in a long time.
What language frontends do you intend to support when 4.1.1
comes into the tree? FreeBSD currently has a Fortran 77
compiler via g77. g77 is no longer supported in the 4.x
series, and its replacement is a Fortran 95 compiler.
--
Steve
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Integrating ProPolice/SSP into FreeBSD
- From: Alexander Kabaev
- Re: Integrating ProPolice/SSP into FreeBSD
- References:
- Integrating ProPolice/SSP into FreeBSD
- From: Jeremie Le Hen
- Re: Integrating ProPolice/SSP into FreeBSD
- From: Alexander Kabaev
- Integrating ProPolice/SSP into FreeBSD
- Prev by Date: Re: Integrating ProPolice/SSP into FreeBSD
- Next by Date: Re: Integrating ProPolice/SSP into FreeBSD
- Previous by thread: Re: Integrating ProPolice/SSP into FreeBSD
- Next by thread: Re: Integrating ProPolice/SSP into FreeBSD
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
