Re: FreeBSD Security Survey
- From: Yann Golanski <yann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 09:28:21 +0100
Quoth Garance A Drosihn on Wed, May 24, 2006 at 15:40:23 -0400
The answer is: build host + jails for a testing environment...Did you just tell him to get another computer for each arch
This'll reduce your actual downtime.
to have as a build machine???
Being a broke college student I don't think that's something
I'd ever do to install updates on my boxes. I can't afford
another computer just to build updates when every other OS
I use does updates in another way....
If you are a college student with a few machines that
you work with, then you can afford some downtime.
Why? Just because I am from a mathematics department with no money for
hardware at all does not mean that our VLE does not have to run all the
time.
So, same question with three machines: home, office and off shore
server. How do I keep them all up to date without having to run the
patches three times?...
BTW, I consider pre-compiled packages to good (easy to install, etc...)
and bad (no fine tuning, etc...) while compile are good for exactly the
opposite reasons. Not sure which is best.
--
yann@xxxxxxxxxx -=*=- www.kierun.org
PGP: 009D 7287 C4A7 FD4F 1680 06E4 F751 7006 9DE2 6318
Attachment:
pgpiJOkYsd4WC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FreeBSD Security Survey
- From: Garance A Drosihn
- Re: FreeBSD Security Survey
- References:
- Re: FreeBSD Security Survey
- From: Roger Marquis
- Re: FreeBSD Security Survey
- From: Yann Golanski
- Re: FreeBSD Security Survey
- From: Marian Hettwer
- Re: FreeBSD Security Survey
- From: Allen
- Re: FreeBSD Security Survey
- From: Garance A Drosihn
- Re: FreeBSD Security Survey
- Prev by Date: Re: FreeBSD Security Survey
- Next by Date: Re: FreeBSD Security Survey
- Previous by thread: Re: FreeBSD Security Survey
- Next by thread: Re: FreeBSD Security Survey
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|