Re: Reflections on Trusting Trust
From: Kris Kennaway (kris_at_obsecurity.org)
Date: 11/30/05
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: Reflections on Trusting Trust"
- In reply to: Kris Kennaway: "Re: Reflections on Trusting Trust"
- Next in thread: Colin Percival: "Re: Reflections on Trusting Trust"
- Reply: Colin Percival: "Re: Reflections on Trusting Trust"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:33:16 -0500 To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 06:27:03PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 01:36:31PM -0200, aristeu wrote:
> > I'm new here, and I've posted only once. I just want to add my "just
> > another user" opinion on this...
> >
> > Signing security advisories that sends the hashes for a file does a nice
> > job.
> >
> > I think the only problem that exists is the package/ports deployment. I
> > belive we can't trust only on hashes for this (tar already does a fine job
> > on integrity...), because it can be easily circunvented. Maybe trusting
> > this it is the real weakest link...
>
> I'd be happy to work with someone who can implement a solution for the
> package side.
Also, pkg_sign(1) has existed for a long time, but needs the support
infrastructure to make it usable.
Kris
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: Reflections on Trusting Trust"
- In reply to: Kris Kennaway: "Re: Reflections on Trusting Trust"
- Next in thread: Colin Percival: "Re: Reflections on Trusting Trust"
- Reply: Colin Percival: "Re: Reflections on Trusting Trust"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]