Re: Need urgent help regarding security

From: Marian Hettwer (MH_at_kernel32.de)
Date: 11/21/05

  • Next message: Lowell Gilbert: "Re: mount -u -r drops nosuid ?"
    Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:16:45 +0100
    To: ray@redshift.com
    
    

    Hej Ray,

    ray@redshift.com wrote:
    >
    > The point isn't to get more secure. You are correct by saying that moving the
    Hu. I thought the point was to get more security. If it's more about
    "stealth", okay, move the daemon to another port :)

    > port # doesn't make anything more secure. But why make it easy for someone that
    > might be doing a scan to find your SSH prompt during a scan that may be focused
    > on ports 21, 22, 25, 80 and 110?
    >
    Of course it's a bit harder to find your sshd, if it's not running on
    tcp/22. And maybe, an automated script won't find the sshd. A human
    being will, indeed, find the sshd pretty quick. Take any port which
    responds with an SYN-ACK to your SYN and of you go on that port with
    telnet...

    > Along these same lines, we used to even re-compile sshd and remove the welcome
    > message/version number in the connect. I know there are two schools of thought
    > on broadcasting your version numbers on connections, but in the mid 90's, we did
    > do that from time to time.
    >
    And if you don't get the ssh banner, it might get harder now :-)

    > Anyway, to each their own :)
    >
    ack.

    Marian
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Lowell Gilbert: "Re: mount -u -r drops nosuid ?"

    Relevant Pages

    • How did this happen?
      ... May 12 06:50:43 localhost sshd: Failed password for illegal user ... cgi from 212.93.149.205 port 2265 ... Starting sshd: ...
      (comp.os.linux.security)
    • Re: bypassing employers proxy to surf anonymously
      ... port 443, so it's harder to distinguish from an https server. ... through the remote sshd. ... You have an option to go with a managed service or an enterprise software. ...
      (Pen-Test)
    • RE: possible ssh hack
      ... What version of SSHD were you running, ... Apache and we can help you out. ... Subject: possible ssh hack ... port 4207 ...
      (Incidents)
    • Re: Possible New Security Tool For FreeBSD, Need Your Help.
      ... We just want to hide the sshd port until we need it. ... >> the Internet where would they put the sniffer? ... Do a traceroute between the host you're ...
      (FreeBSD-Security)
    • Re: SSHD reconfig
      ... run sshd on some port other than 22, ... Multiple layers of security are better. ... Apple, you mangled it. ...
      (comp.sys.mac.system)