Re: Is the server portion of freebsd-update open source?
From: Colin Percival (cperciva_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 10/29/05
- Previous message: db: "Re: Non-executable stack"
- In reply to: markzero: "Re: Is the server portion of freebsd-update open source?"
- Next in thread: markzero: "Re: Is the server portion of freebsd-update open source?"
- Reply: markzero: "Re: Is the server portion of freebsd-update open source?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:25:56 -0700 To: markzero <mark@darklogik.org>
markzero wrote:
> In my case, all I'm after is a way to distribute a custom build of
> FreeBSD. When I say custom, I really just mean a standard build with
> a custom make.conf:
>
> [snip]
>
> I'd rather not use NFS, for security reasons, so I've had to resort
> to ad-hoc shell scripts to do updates. It'd be nice to have something
> officially supported to replace them.
It looks like nearly all of your customizations simply involve removing
certain files from the system. FreeBSD Update is designed to handle
this situation: If there is a security update in sendmail and you have
deleted the sendmail binaries, FreeBSD Update will ignore that particular
update.
Is there any reason why this is insufficient?
Colin Percival
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: db: "Re: Non-executable stack"
- In reply to: markzero: "Re: Is the server portion of freebsd-update open source?"
- Next in thread: markzero: "Re: Is the server portion of freebsd-update open source?"
- Reply: markzero: "Re: Is the server portion of freebsd-update open source?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|