Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-05:21.openssl
From: Kris Kennaway (kris_at_obsecurity.org)
Date: 10/12/05
- Previous message: Timothy Smith: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-05:21.openssl"
- In reply to: Vladimir Terziev: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-05:21.openssl"
- Next in thread: Colin Percival: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-05:21.openssl"
- Reply: Colin Percival: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-05:21.openssl"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:56:51 -0400 To: Vladimir Terziev <vladimir.terziev@sun-fish.com>
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 11:14:57AM +0300, Vladimir Terziev wrote:
>
> Ok, i think the FreeBSD team should isolate all statically linked ?
> applications which are part of the operating system and which depend
> on OpenSSL. They must be re-build (not the whole operating system)
> in order OpenSSL changes to be applyed to them.
AFAIK there are no statically linked openssl applications in the
FreeBSD base system, unless someone has specifically compiled them
that way on their own.
Kris
P.S. Please wrap your lines at 70 characters so that your emails may
be easily read.
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Timothy Smith: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-05:21.openssl"
- In reply to: Vladimir Terziev: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-05:21.openssl"
- Next in thread: Colin Percival: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-05:21.openssl"
- Reply: Colin Percival: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-05:21.openssl"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|