Re: Problem with portaudit's database
From: Simon L. Nielsen (simon_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 09/07/05
- Previous message: Dmitry Pryanishnikov: "Problem with portaudit's database"
- In reply to: Dmitry Pryanishnikov: "Problem with portaudit's database"
- Next in thread: Dmitry Pryanishnikov: "Re: Problem with portaudit's database"
- Reply: Dmitry Pryanishnikov: "Re: Problem with portaudit's database"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 13:34:36 +0200 To: Dmitry Pryanishnikov <dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua>
On 2005.09.07 10:35:21 +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
> Yesterday portaudit notified me about squid's vulnerability, but today it
> didn't (despite I haven't upgraded squid). This has attracted my attention,
> so I've compared yesterday's and today's auditfile.tbz:
>
> -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 29875 Sep 6 15:40 auditfile.tbz
>
> vs.
>
> -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 5685 Sep 7 10:11 auditfile.tbz
>
> I don't see commits to vuln.xml during this time, so I suspect auditfile
> generation error. Most known vulnerabilities are now unlisted. Please check
> this issue.
Hmm, I just ran portaudit -F and got:
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 29857 7 Sep 13:10 auditfile.tbz
Could you try forcing a new download (portaudit -F) to see if it fixes
the problem?
-- Simon L. Nielsen FreeBSD Security Team
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Dmitry Pryanishnikov: "Problem with portaudit's database"
- In reply to: Dmitry Pryanishnikov: "Problem with portaudit's database"
- Next in thread: Dmitry Pryanishnikov: "Re: Problem with portaudit's database"
- Reply: Dmitry Pryanishnikov: "Re: Problem with portaudit's database"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]