Re: packets with syn/fin vs pf_norm.c

From: Garrett Wollman (wollman_at_csail.mit.edu)
Date: 07/04/05

  • Next message: Darren Reed: "Re: packets with syn/fin vs pf_norm.c" 
    Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 21:59:37 -0400
To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)

    <<On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 02:53:33 +0200, des@des.no (Dag-Erling Smørgrav) said:

    > It is not invalid for a TCP segment to have both SYN and FIN set. See
    > for instance RFC 1644.

    RFC 793 is perhaps the better reference, followed by RFC 1025.

    -GAWollman

    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

  • Next message: Darren Reed: "Re: packets with syn/fin vs pf_norm.c"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: urllib interpretation of URL with ".."
      ... or by avoiding traversal of the reference. ... The common practice seems to be for client-side implementations to ... Note that RFC 3986 obsoletes RFC 2396, ... good practice re generic URL syntax (URI and relative reference ...
      (comp.lang.python)
    • _ SHOULD _ Have No Back Reference.
      ... I will now use this RFC to shut people up ... " back reference " refers to ... So Google.COM is in violation of RFC 1036. ... So every last poster in this thread ...
      (sci.physics)
    • Re: integration between struts and servlet auth
      ... My reference is RFC 1855, ... > ok, I don't have any RFC to refer to, .. ... You can refer to the same one. ... Andrew Thompson ...
      (comp.lang.java.programmer)
    • You are in violation of RFC 1036.
      ... " Re: The ultimate luxury? ... " back reference " refers to ... So Google.COM is also in violation of RFC 1036. ...
      (sci.physics)
    • Re: rules for MX records
      ... Cnews-ms wrote: ... > Can I point my MX record to an alias or should I use an A record. ... > there an RFC to reference?? ...
      (microsoft.public.win2000.dns)