packets with syn/fin vs pf_norm.c
From: Garrett Wollman (wollman_at_csail.mit.edu)
Date: 07/03/05
- Previous message: Jesper Wallin: "packets with syn/fin vs pf_norm.c"
- In reply to: Jesper Wallin: "packets with syn/fin vs pf_norm.c"
- Next in thread: Jesper Wallin: "Re: packets with syn/fin vs pf_norm.c"
- Reply: Jesper Wallin: "Re: packets with syn/fin vs pf_norm.c"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 22:03:48 -0400 To: Jesper Wallin <jesper@www.hackunite.net>
<<On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 00:06:37 +0200, Jesper Wallin <jesper@www.hackunite.net> said:
> First of all, I know that not dropping SYN/FIN isn't really a big deal, it
> just makes no sense. But since it doesn't make any sense, I don't see
> the reason why not to discard them.
Perhaps because you are under the erroneous impression that such
packets are nonsensical.
-GAWollman
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Jesper Wallin: "packets with syn/fin vs pf_norm.c"
- In reply to: Jesper Wallin: "packets with syn/fin vs pf_norm.c"
- Next in thread: Jesper Wallin: "Re: packets with syn/fin vs pf_norm.c"
- Reply: Jesper Wallin: "Re: packets with syn/fin vs pf_norm.c"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
