Re: Will 5.4 be an "Extended Life" release?

From: Uzi Klein (uzi_at_bmby.com)
Date: 04/18/05

  • Next message: Mike Tancsa: "Re: IPSEC l2tpd and Windows shares problem"
    Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 13:01:13 +0200
    To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
    
    

    Brett Glass wrote:
    > At 09:22 PM 4/17/2005, Colin Percival wrote:
    >
    >
    >>Unless someone wants to step forward with an offer to pay the
    >>salaries of the release engineering team for a few months,
    >
    >
    > The same way they're being paid for their work on other
    > releases? ;-)
    >
    ouch!
    >
    >>Eh? If the important part is the security fixes, why not just
    >>install 4.11 and then apply the security fixes?
    >

    That's what we usually do whenever there's a security fix...
    I didn't see a new release pops up for after each security fix.

    >
    > That's fine for awhile, but there will soon be enough
    > that this will be painful. And it may be a good idea to
    > produce a release containing other code that's been backported
    > from 5.x and 6.x.

    Sounds interesting, but, while you were asking about SMP, AMD64 etc.
    that's not backporting, That's kernel handling AFAIK.

    >
    > --Brett Glass
    >

    -- 
    Uzi Klein
    B.M.B.Y Software Systems LTD.
    http://www.bmby.com
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    

  • Next message: Mike Tancsa: "Re: IPSEC l2tpd and Windows shares problem"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3
      ... at fixing 6.3 or throw some resources at backporting security fixes to ... I will apparently be backporting the security fixes myself until 6.4 ships. ... source project. ...
      (freebsd-stable)
    • Re: [stable] Linux 2.6.25.10
      ... why aren't security fixes that you fix relevant to users ... Backporting any fix to older kernels is a chore, ... "why aren't security fixes that you fix relevant to users of older kernels" ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [stable] Linux 2.6.25.10
      ... why aren't security fixes that you fix relevant to users ... Backporting any fix to older kernels is a chore, ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: A few general questions from a Debian newbie
      ... > Debian versioning, but if normal Debian practices are being followed, ... I'm sure you can review the package changelog to find out for ... 1.04 has NONE 1.07 security fixes in it. ... Backporting from security fixes in Mozilla or Firefox are to heavy ...
      (Debian-User)