Re: ipfw deny or reject - not just a matter of taste?

From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav (des_at_des.no)
Date: 02/28/05

  • Next message: Xin LI: "bind() on 127.0.0.1 in jail: bound to the outside address?" 
    Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:19:00 +0100
To: Peter Much <pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org>

    Peter Much <pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org> writes:
    > Maybe such things may already happen when reloading rules - that depends
    > on their sequence and individual layout. So it really is a good thing that
    > ipfw provides the atomic functions for shifting sets of rules.

    Look for 'ipfw set' in the ipfw man page.

    DES 

    -- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@des.no
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: Xin LI: "bind() on 127.0.0.1 in jail: bound to the outside address?"