Re: Importing into rc.firewal rules
From: Francisco Reyes (lists_at_natserv.com)
Date: 11/21/04
- Previous message: David Wolfskill: "Re: Importing into rc.firewal rules"
- In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Importing into rc.firewal rules"
- Next in thread: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Importing into rc.firewal rules"
- Reply: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Importing into rc.firewal rules"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 21:09:38 -0500 (EST) To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> If the list is long it may be almost as good, if not better, to use
> blackhole routes for it.
I was not familiar with the term. Looking in Google came up with a link.
However in that link they recommend against that method.
Also any link on how to implement it?
What would be the advantage of that route vs ipfw?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: David Wolfskill: "Re: Importing into rc.firewal rules"
- In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Importing into rc.firewal rules"
- Next in thread: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Importing into rc.firewal rules"
- Reply: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Importing into rc.firewal rules"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]