Re: Kerberos 5 Security Alert?
From: Jeff Aitken (jaitken_at_aitken.com)
Date: 09/14/04
- Previous message: Daniel Rudy: "Kerberos 5 Security Alert?"
- In reply to: Daniel Rudy: "Kerberos 5 Security Alert?"
- Next in thread: Matthew Seaman: "Re: Kerberos 5 Security Alert?"
- Reply: Matthew Seaman: "Re: Kerberos 5 Security Alert?"
- Reply: Daniel Rudy: "Re: Kerberos 5 Security Alert?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 18:35:43 -0400 To: Daniel Rudy <dr2867@pacbell.net>
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 03:07:36PM -0700, Daniel Rudy wrote:
> Does FreeBSD use the MIT implementation?
No, the system-supplied krb5 bits are from the Heimdal distribution.
The MIT distribution is available as a port, but is not part of the
base system.
> Why wasn't there a FreeBSD security alert for Kerberos 5?
I may be wrong, but I think that security alerts are issued only
for the base system (i.e., things that are part of FreeBSD proper).
Vulnerabilities that affect ports are documented here:
I'm sure someone will correct me if this is wrong.
--Jeff
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Daniel Rudy: "Kerberos 5 Security Alert?"
- In reply to: Daniel Rudy: "Kerberos 5 Security Alert?"
- Next in thread: Matthew Seaman: "Re: Kerberos 5 Security Alert?"
- Reply: Matthew Seaman: "Re: Kerberos 5 Security Alert?"
- Reply: Daniel Rudy: "Re: Kerberos 5 Security Alert?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
