Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack
From: Gary Corcoran (garycor_at_comcast.net)
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:10:30 -0400 To: Gary Corcoran <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
> In any event, it still seems like a TTL of 255 is overkill for this application...
Unless, of course, you want to only accept packets with TTL
of 255. This might be fine when both ends are setup to work
this way. But it might break general interoperability...
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "email@example.com"