Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack

From: Gary Corcoran (garycor_at_comcast.net)
Date: 04/22/04

  • Next message: Bill Fumerola: "Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack"
    Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:10:30 -0400
    To: Gary Corcoran <garycor@comcast.net>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org
    
    

    > In any event, it still seems like a TTL of 255 is overkill for this application...

    Unless, of course, you want to only accept packets with TTL
    of 255. This might be fine when both ends are setup to work
    this way. But it might break general interoperability...

    Gary

    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Bill Fumerola: "Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack"