Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack
From: Kevin Stevens (Kevin_Stevens_at_pursued-with.net)
Date: 04/21/04
- Previous message: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack"
- In reply to: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack"
- Next in thread: Mike Benjamin: "Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack"
- Reply: Mike Benjamin: "Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:16:31 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, [iso-8859-1] Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> writes:
> I think the default ttl of 64 was an arbitrary choice. You would
> probably be fine using 32, but any lower than that and you would start
> having trouble crossing oceans.
?? Because of all the router buoys floating around??
KeS
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack"
- In reply to: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack"
- Next in thread: Mike Benjamin: "Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack"
- Reply: Mike Benjamin: "Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|