Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack
From: Laurent Frigault (lfrigault_at_agneau.org)
Date: 04/21/04
- Previous message: Borja Marcos: "Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack"
- In reply to: Mike Tancsa: "Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack"
- Next in thread: Charles Swiger: "Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 22:24:51 +0200 To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 04:14:46PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > Well, not every BGP sessions are established between directly
> >connected interfaces. This would not work with "multi-hop BGP" sessions :-)
>
> Thanks, I realize that, especially with iBGP. However for directly
> connected eBGP peers, the question still stands.
Yes. This should be better handled by quagga/zebra .
Regards,
-- Laurent Frigault | <url:http://www.agneau.org/> If NT is the answer, you didn't understand the question. _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Borja Marcos: "Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack"
- In reply to: Mike Tancsa: "Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack"
- Next in thread: Charles Swiger: "Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|