Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack
From: Borja Marcos (borjamar_at_sarenet.es)
Date: 04/21/04
- Previous message: Mike Silbersack: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] IETF Draft - Fix for TCP vulnerability (fwd)"
- In reply to: Mike Tancsa: "Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack"
- Next in thread: Mike Tancsa: "Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack"
- Reply: Mike Tancsa: "Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack"
- Reply: Bill Fumerola: "Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 22:05:49 +0200 To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
> Are there any "bad things" that can happen by doing this ?
Well, not every BGP sessions are established between directly
connected interfaces. This would not work with "multi-hop BGP" sessions
:-)
Borja.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Mike Silbersack: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] IETF Draft - Fix for TCP vulnerability (fwd)"
- In reply to: Mike Tancsa: "Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack"
- Next in thread: Mike Tancsa: "Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack"
- Reply: Mike Tancsa: "Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack"
- Reply: Bill Fumerola: "Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
