Re: TCP RST attack
From: Bruce M Simpson (bms_at_spc.org)
Date: 04/21/04
- Previous message: Bruce M Simpson: "Re: TCP RST attack"
- In reply to: Matthew Dillon: "Re: TCP RST attack"
- Next in thread: Mike Tancsa: "Re: TCP RST attack"
- Reply: Mike Tancsa: "Re: TCP RST attack"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 01:02:54 +0100 To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 01:45:20PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> 99.9% of all BGP links are direct connections (meaning that they
> terminate at a router rather then pass through one). No packet to
> or from port 179 has any business being routed from one network to
> another in virtually all BGP link setups so the fix is utterly trivial.
This isn't necessarily the case with eBGP multihop or route-server based
setups.
Regards,
BMS
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Bruce M Simpson: "Re: TCP RST attack"
- In reply to: Matthew Dillon: "Re: TCP RST attack"
- Next in thread: Mike Tancsa: "Re: TCP RST attack"
- Reply: Mike Tancsa: "Re: TCP RST attack"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]