Re: cvs commit: ports/multimedia/xine Makefile
From: Joe Marcus Clarke (marcus_at_marcuscom.com)
Date: 03/30/04
- Previous message: Oliver Eikemeier: "Re: cvs commit: ports/multimedia/xine Makefile"
- In reply to: Oliver Eikemeier: "Re: cvs commit: ports/multimedia/xine Makefile"
- Next in thread: Jacques A. Vidrine: "Re: cvs commit: ports/multimedia/xine Makefile"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 11:24:06 -0500
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 04:13, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
> Michael Nottebrock wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > However, it seems to me that marking ports FORBIDDEN for security
> > reasons is more or less obsoleted (and made redundant) by
> > portaudit/VuXML and committers having to hand-scan VuXML for updates and
> > mark ports FORBIDDEN by hand just seems like duplicated (and
> > error-prone) work... so maybe it's time to to away with marking ports
> > FORBIDDEN for security reasons completely?
>
> I think portmgr@ is the authority here. CC'ed.
Since VuXML is still optional, and newbies will not be likely to have
it, I believe we still should be marking ports FORBIDDEN for security
reasons. Better to wear a belt and suspenders.
Joe
-- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
- application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part
- Previous message: Oliver Eikemeier: "Re: cvs commit: ports/multimedia/xine Makefile"
- In reply to: Oliver Eikemeier: "Re: cvs commit: ports/multimedia/xine Makefile"
- Next in thread: Jacques A. Vidrine: "Re: cvs commit: ports/multimedia/xine Makefile"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|