Re: strace hard lock

jan.muenther_at_nruns.com
Date: 03/07/04

  • Next message: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Call for review: restricted hardlinks." 
    Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 17:44:28 +0100
To: Ender <ender@tog.net>

    Hm, hm. Well, normally, one would use truss or ktrace, since strace isn't
    part of the base system.
    Also, are you sure you're not simply running out of system resources, like
    forkbombing or something? Tried the same thing with a restricted user?

    I couldn't reproduce it over here, on a single CPU 5.2.1 box.

    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

  • Next message: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Call for review: restricted hardlinks."

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: /dev/random on linux, openssh 3.2.3p1
      ... A simple trace (truss, strace, ktrace, etc.) to see if SSH is reading ...
      (comp.security.ssh)
    • Re: /dev/random on linux, openssh 3.2.3p1
      ... A simple trace (truss, strace, ktrace, etc.) to see if SSH is reading ...
      (comp.security.ssh)
    • Re: Better ktrace ?
      ... > Is there anything better than ktrace? ... More like truss or strace? ... > interested in the details of socket calls like connect and send. ... There's strace, I suppose, but although there's a FreeBSD port for it it ...
      (uk.comp.sys.mac)
    • Re: ktrace as a replacement for strace
      ... >>I'm looking for a replacement for the strace program I used to use on ... It looks like the bsd version of strace would be ... Take a look at the truss command in the base system, ... Is truss still being fixed to work without procfs or is ktrace a better ...
      (freebsd-questions)