Re: traffic normalizer for ipfw?
From: Bruno Afonso (bruno_at_mrna.ist.utl.pt)
Date: 02/26/04
- Previous message: Sergey A. Osokin: "Re: HEADS UP: OpenSSH 3.8p1"
- In reply to: Darren Reed: "Re: traffic normalizer for ipfw?"
- Next in thread: Christophe Prevotaux: "Re: traffic normalizer for ipfw?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:43:42 +0000 To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Darren Reed wrote:
> normalizing is over rated as a firewall feature - it's really
> something that belongs in IDS software.
>
>
>>We're looking at bringing pf into the tree.
>
>
> For what benefit you have to wonder...
It's BSD licensed. It's nicely integrated with altq that will also
hopefully come into the tree. That alone is worth it, let alone other
nice features. And yes, users like this features and that's something
you are going to have to live with.
Please stop this pf bashing you are fond of and stop thinking you know
what others like/want in a firewall. Choice is a great thing, respect that.
BA
-- Bruno Miguel Afonso Biological Eng. student D.E.Q. @ I.S.T. - Portugal GnuPG Public key: http://dequim.ist.utl.pt/~bruno/gpg _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Sergey A. Osokin: "Re: HEADS UP: OpenSSH 3.8p1"
- In reply to: Darren Reed: "Re: traffic normalizer for ipfw?"
- Next in thread: Christophe Prevotaux: "Re: traffic normalizer for ipfw?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|