Re: [Fwd: [gentoo-announce] [ GLSA 200402-07 ] Clamav 0.65 DoSvulnerability]
From: Peter Pentchev (roam_at_ringlet.net)
Date: 02/19/04
- Previous message: Brian Keefer: "Re: Rooted system"
- In reply to: David Peall: "RE: [Fwd: [gentoo-announce] [ GLSA 200402-07 ] Clamav 0.65 DoSvulnerability]"
- Next in thread: Peter Pentchev: "Re: [Fwd: [gentoo-announce] [ GLSA 200402-07 ] Clamav 0.65 DoSvulnerability]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:26:28 +0200 To: David Peall <david@wcsn.wcape.school.za>
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:38:50AM +0200, David Peall wrote:
> Hi
>
> The FreeBSD port has been updated for the DoS vulnerability but the
> version is still
> the same.
>
> See:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/security/clamav/
Err.. strictly speaking, the port's version is not the same: it is
now 0.65_7, it was 0.65_6 before. The 'port revision' number was
introduced for precisely this purpose: to provide an indicator that
something important has changed in the FreeBSD port even when
the mainstream version of the ported software remains the same.
G'luck,
Peter
-- Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@sbnd.net roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 If I were you, who would be reading this sentence?
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Brian Keefer: "Re: Rooted system"
- In reply to: David Peall: "RE: [Fwd: [gentoo-announce] [ GLSA 200402-07 ] Clamav 0.65 DoSvulnerability]"
- Next in thread: Peter Pentchev: "Re: [Fwd: [gentoo-announce] [ GLSA 200402-07 ] Clamav 0.65 DoSvulnerability]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]