Re: is this mbuf problem real?
From: Damian Gerow (damian_at_sentex.net)
Date: 02/18/04
- Previous message: Thomas T. Veldhouse: "[Fwd: [gentoo-announce] [ GLSA 200402-07 ] Clamav 0.65 DoS vulnerability]"
- In reply to: Baby Peanut: "is this mbuf problem real?"
- Next in thread: Jacques A. Vidrine: "Re: is this mbuf problem real?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:25:57 -0500 To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Thus spake Baby Peanut (baby_p_nut2@yahoo.com) [18/02/04 16:23]:
> Detection: iDEFENSE has confirmed this vulnerability exists in FreeBSD
> 5.1 (default install from media). It is expected that it also exists
> in earlier versions.
Perhaps a better question: Can anyone /confirm/ that it exists in actual
stable releases, not just the development branch?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Thomas T. Veldhouse: "[Fwd: [gentoo-announce] [ GLSA 200402-07 ] Clamav 0.65 DoS vulnerability]"
- In reply to: Baby Peanut: "is this mbuf problem real?"
- Next in thread: Jacques A. Vidrine: "Re: is this mbuf problem real?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
