Re: Question about securelevel
From: Jim Zajkowski (jim_at_jimz.net)
Date: 02/11/04
- Previous message: roberto_at_redix.it: "Re: Question about securelevel"
- In reply to: roberto_at_redix.it: "Re: Question about securelevel"
- Next in thread: Patrick Proniewski: "Re: Question about securelevel"
- Reply: Patrick Proniewski: "Re: Question about securelevel"
- Reply: roberto_at_redix.it: "Re: Question about securelevel"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 08:30:36 -0500 To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
On Feb 11, 2004, at 8:12 AM, roberto@redix.it wrote:
> Could this configuration be considered secure, according to you?
There's no way to determine that without some consideration of the
threats you are facing. Security considerations against simple attacks
(e.g., kiddies) are a lot different than considerations against
industrial espionage, against discovery by the secret police, and
against very smart government spies.
What are you protecting? From whom? At what cost?
--Jim
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: roberto_at_redix.it: "Re: Question about securelevel"
- In reply to: roberto_at_redix.it: "Re: Question about securelevel"
- Next in thread: Patrick Proniewski: "Re: Question about securelevel"
- Reply: Patrick Proniewski: "Re: Question about securelevel"
- Reply: roberto_at_redix.it: "Re: Question about securelevel"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]