Re[2]: ipfw question

• Previous message: Peter Jeremy: "Re: IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT becomes default to deny"
• In reply to: Peter Pentchev: "Re: ipfw question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 13:27:37 +0300
To: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>

It's funny. This (your) variant:

ipfw add count from IP1 not to { IP2,IP3 }

was accepted by ipfw but resulted in (was rewritten by ipfw as) the rule:

ipfw add count from IP1 to not IP2,IP3

So, I guess that my initial
ipfw add count from IP1 to not IP2,IP3
should be what I was looking for.

Thank you for your reply.
Indeed
not to { IP2,IP3 }
is more clear sentence from the point of human logic then the one used
by ipfw :)

Alex.

PP> On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 01:46:18PM +0300, freebsd@tern.ru wrote:
PP> [actually, I wrote]
>> PP> Could you try
>> PP> ipfw add count from IP1 to not { IP2,IP3 }
>>
>> Definitely I tried it already before writing to group. It does not
>> work.
>> Here is the exact error message for this try:
>> ipfw: hostname ``'' unknown

PP> Er, sorry, my mistake; could you try 'not to' instead of 'to not'? :)

PP> G'luck,
PP> Peter

_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

• Previous message: Peter Jeremy: "Re: IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT becomes default to deny"
• In reply to: Peter Pentchev: "Re: ipfw question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]