Re: HiFn / FAST_IPSEC question
From: Sam Leffler (sam_at_errno.com)
To: Mike Tancsa <firstname.lastname@example.org>, <email@example.com> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 13:33:26 -0800
On Friday 16 January 2004 10:48 am, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> I am more curious about what happens if you try 194 sessions on one or 65
> on the other, not why one is rated lower than the other.
When you try to allocate the SPI it will fail because you won't be able to
create a crypto session (this is FAST_IPSEC only). The right thing to do
(probably) is to fallback to s/w crypto but I don't believe the existing
crypto framework is smart enough.
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "email@example.com"