Re: mtree vs tripwire

From: Andrew Kenneth Milton (akm_at_theinternet.com.au)
Date: 01/14/04

  • Next message: D J Hawkey Jr: "Re: mtree vs tripwire" 
    Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 05:38:50 +1100
To: D J Hawkey Jr <hawkeyd@visi.com>

    +-------[ D J Hawkey Jr ]----------------------
    | On Jan 14, at 07:09 PM, Jesper Louis Andersen wrote:
    | >
    | > > This might seem really naive, but can mtree be used effectively as
    | > > a native-to-core-OS tripwire equivalent? Would it be as efficient in
    | > > terms of time-to-run and resource requirements?
    | >
    | > Pro: distributed with base
    | > Con: Only available for *BSD architectures as far as my knowledge goes.
    |
    | I'm aware of both, yes; hence my question. FreeBSD is all I'm dealing
    | with, where my question is concerned.
    |
    | Is your reply from personal experience, or is it the same "Hey, it
    | could..." as is my question? If the former, would you elaborate on the
    | implementation details?

    The manpage for mtree has an example... 

    -- 
Totally Holistic Enterprises Internet|                      | Andrew Milton
The Internet (Aust) Pty Ltd          |  M:+61 416 022 411   |
ACN: 082 081 472 ABN: 83 082 081 472 |akm@theinternet.com.au| Carpe Daemon
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: D J Hawkey Jr: "Re: mtree vs tripwire"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: mtree vs tripwire
      ... >> This might seem really naive, but can mtree be used effectively as ... > Pro: distributed with base ... would you elaborate on the ...
      (FreeBSD-Security)
    • Re: mtree vs tripwire
      ... Pro: distributed with base ... Con: Only available for *BSD architectures as far as my knowledge goes. ... last time I looked tripwire ...
      (FreeBSD-Security)