mtree vs tripwire
From: D J Hawkey Jr (hawkeyd_at_visi.com)
Date: 01/14/04
- Previous message: George Hartzell: "IPSEC btwn stable and Linksys BEFVP41 stopped working."
- Next in thread: Jesper Louis Andersen: "Re: mtree vs tripwire"
- Reply: Jesper Louis Andersen: "Re: mtree vs tripwire"
- Reply: Dorin H: "Re: mtree vs tripwire"
- Reply: Garrett Wollman: "mtree vs tripwire"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:42:15 -0600 To: security at FreeBSD <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
Hi all.
This might seem really naive, but can mtree be used effectively as
a native-to-core-OS tripwire equivalent? Would it be as efficient in
terms of time-to-run and resource requirements?
What sort of pitfalls should I be aware of?
Has anyone here done this? If so, would you care to share your
scripts/techniques?
Thanks,
Dave
--
______________________ ______________________
\__________________ \ D. J. HAWKEY JR. / __________________/
\________________/\ hawkeyd@visi.com /\________________/
http://www.visi.com/~hawkeyd/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: George Hartzell: "IPSEC btwn stable and Linksys BEFVP41 stopped working."
- Next in thread: Jesper Louis Andersen: "Re: mtree vs tripwire"
- Reply: Jesper Louis Andersen: "Re: mtree vs tripwire"
- Reply: Dorin H: "Re: mtree vs tripwire"
- Reply: Garrett Wollman: "mtree vs tripwire"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]