Re: interface bonding
From: Ruslan Ermilov (ru_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 12/22/03
- Previous message: Vlad Galu: "Re: interface bonding"
- In reply to: Richard Bejtlich: "Re: interface bonding"
- Next in thread: John: "Re: interface bonding"
- Reply: John: "Re: interface bonding"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 22:13:41 +0200 To: Richard Bejtlich <richard_bejtlich@yahoo.com>
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 10:48:12AM -0800, Richard Bejtlich wrote:
> Thanks to Dmitry's tip on ng_eiface, I'm happy to
> report using the following configuration to bond
> interfaces with ng_one2many and a virtual interface
> ngeth0.
>
> sf2 and sf3 are real interfaces connected to my 10/100
> tap.
> --
> kldload ng_ether
> kldload ng_one2many
> ifconfig sf2 promisc -arp up
> ifconfig sf3 promisc -arp up
> ngctl mkpeer . eiface hook ether
> ngctl mkpeer ngeth0: one2many lower one
> ngctl connect sf2: ngeth0:lower lower many0
> ngctl connect sf3: ngeth0:lower lower many1
> ifconfig ngeth0 -arp up
> --
>
> It works:
>
You can also try to dispense with ng_ether(4) completely
by attaching the "ether" hook of the eiface node to the
one2many's "one" hook directly.
Cheers,
-- Ruslan Ermilov FreeBSD committer ru@FreeBSD.org
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Vlad Galu: "Re: interface bonding"
- In reply to: Richard Bejtlich: "Re: interface bonding"
- Next in thread: John: "Re: interface bonding"
- Reply: John: "Re: interface bonding"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]