LKM support (Was: Re: possible compromise or just misreading logs)
From: Damian Gerow (damian_at_sentex.net)
Date: 12/08/03
- Previous message: jan.muenther_at_nruns.com: "Re: possible compromise or just misreading logs"
- In reply to: Steve Francis: "Re: possible compromise or just misreading logs"
- Next in thread: Petri Riihikallio: "Re: LKM support (Was: Re: possible compromise or just misreading logs)"
- Reply: Petri Riihikallio: "Re: LKM support (Was: Re: possible compromise or just misreading logs)"
- Reply: Crist J. Clark: "Re: LKM support (Was: Re: possible compromise or just misreading logs)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 12:37:15 -0500 To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Thus spake Steve Francis (steve@expertcity.com) [08/12/03 12:30]:
> And just adding my voice to the "tripwire is good to run, but not a
> panacea" argument - if a machine gets a KLM loaded in a compromise,
> there is no way tripwire can be assured it is verifying the binary it
> asks the kernel for information about. Nothing to stop the compromised
> kernel returning the original binary for all requests, except for those
> needed to do Evil. If you get a root compromise so that a KLM can be
> loaded, all bets are off. Short of that, I think tripwire makes it very
> very hard to change files on a system w/o being detected. As long as
> that is all the faith you put in tripwire, and use to verify just that
> purpose and no more, its great, and it (or something like it, like AIDE)
> is essential.
On that note, is there any way to disable LKM support in FreeBSD? Or is
that what NO_MODULES does?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: jan.muenther_at_nruns.com: "Re: possible compromise or just misreading logs"
- In reply to: Steve Francis: "Re: possible compromise or just misreading logs"
- Next in thread: Petri Riihikallio: "Re: LKM support (Was: Re: possible compromise or just misreading logs)"
- Reply: Petri Riihikallio: "Re: LKM support (Was: Re: possible compromise or just misreading logs)"
- Reply: Crist J. Clark: "Re: LKM support (Was: Re: possible compromise or just misreading logs)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|