Re: What could be on udp:48152
From: Mike Silbersack (silby_at_silby.com)
Date: 11/13/03
- Previous message: James Raftery: "Re: What could be on udp:48152"
- In reply to: Dmitry S. Makovey: "What could be on udp:48152"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 12:23:07 -0600 (CST) To: "Dmitry S. Makovey" <dmitry@athabascau.ca>
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Dmitry S. Makovey wrote:
> dimon@gateway ~ > sockstat | grep 49152
> bind named 270 4 udp4 *:49152 *:*
>
> Now', is there any reason for bind to use this port?
> Googling for that subject didn't bring any results other than usualy this port
> is first available for dynamic ports. Which doesn't make sence to me.
>
> System:
> FreeBSD 5.1
>
> - --
> Dmitry Makovey
Bind uses a dynamically bound port for outbound DNS queries. 5.1 uses a
different range of ports (49152-65535) for dynamic ports than 4.x did
(1024-5000). If you search for bind and port 1024, you'll find hundreds
of people asking the same question. :)
Mike "Silby" Silbersack
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: James Raftery: "Re: What could be on udp:48152"
- In reply to: Dmitry S. Makovey: "What could be on udp:48152"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|