Re: What could be on udp:48152
From: James Raftery (james_at_kerna.ie)
Date: 11/13/03
- Previous message: Dmitry S. Makovey: "What could be on udp:48152"
- In reply to: Dmitry S. Makovey: "What could be on udp:48152"
- Next in thread: Dmitry S. Makovey: "Re: What could be on udp:48152"
- Reply: Dmitry S. Makovey: "Re: What could be on udp:48152"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 18:20:48 +0000 To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 11:12:10AM -0700, Dmitry S. Makovey wrote:
> dimon@gateway ~ > sockstat | grep 49152
> bind named 270 4 udp4 *:49152 *:*
>
> Now', is there any reason for bind to use this port? Googling for
> that subject didn't bring any results other than usualy this port is
> first available for dynamic ports. Which doesn't make sence to me.
It's the port it uses for sysqueries. You can tell named to use a specific
port using the query-source option.
ATB,
james
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Dmitry S. Makovey: "What could be on udp:48152"
- In reply to: Dmitry S. Makovey: "What could be on udp:48152"
- Next in thread: Dmitry S. Makovey: "Re: What could be on udp:48152"
- Reply: Dmitry S. Makovey: "Re: What could be on udp:48152"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|