Re: Veractiy and FreeBSD
From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav (des_at_des.no)
Date: 11/06/03
- Previous message: Bruce A. Mah: "Re: FBSD All-in-one security box?"
- In reply to: Kim Needham: "Re: Veractiy and FreeBSD"
- Next in thread: Garrett Wollman: "Re: Veractiy and FreeBSD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Kim Needham <kim.needham@rocksoft.com> Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 19:44:11 +0100
Kim Needham <kim.needham@rocksoft.com> writes:
> Since FreeBSD 5.x seems to no longer use a mounted proc filesystem but proc
> is mounted on the root device, this check will need to be removed for
> FreeBSD 5.x.
Bollocks. The only practical difference between procfs in 4.x and 5.x
is that it is not mounted by default in 5.x.
To the original poster, removing PSEUDOFS and PROCFS from the kernel
achieves absolutely nothing, as mount_procfs will simply load the
module. You need to unmount /proc, remove the corresponding line from
/etc/fstab, and read a book or two about Unix system administration
(Nemeth, Snyder, Seebass, Hein is a good start)
DES
-- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@des.no _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Bruce A. Mah: "Re: FBSD All-in-one security box?"
- In reply to: Kim Needham: "Re: Veractiy and FreeBSD"
- Next in thread: Garrett Wollman: "Re: Veractiy and FreeBSD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|