Re: IPSec VPNs: to gif or not to gif
From: Bill Swingle (unfurl_at_dub.net)
Date: 10/26/03
- Previous message: David: "Re: /var partition overflow (due to spyware?) in FreeBSD default install"
- In reply to: G. Panula: "Re: IPSec VPNs: to gif or not to gif"
- Next in thread: Crist J. Clark: "Re: IPSec VPNs: to gif or not to gif"
- Reply: Crist J. Clark: "Re: IPSec VPNs: to gif or not to gif"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 26 Oct 2003 08:52:22 -0800 Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 08:52:22 -0800 To: "G. Panula" <greg.panula@lexisnexis.com>
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 06:23:03AM -0500, G. Panula wrote:
> Current behavior is encrypted packet is handled by ipfw once, then after
> decryption it is only handled by ipfw(again) if it passes thru an
> interface didn't arrive on.
Does this apply to ipfilter as well?
-Bill
-- -=| Bill Swingle - <unfurl@(dub.net|freebsd.org)> -=| Every message PGP signed -=| PGP Fingerprint: C1E3 49D1 EFC9 3EE0 EA6E 6414 5200 1C95 8E09 0223 -=| "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers" Pablo Picasso
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: David: "Re: /var partition overflow (due to spyware?) in FreeBSD default install"
- In reply to: G. Panula: "Re: IPSec VPNs: to gif or not to gif"
- Next in thread: Crist J. Clark: "Re: IPSec VPNs: to gif or not to gif"
- Reply: Crist J. Clark: "Re: IPSec VPNs: to gif or not to gif"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
