Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:14.arp
From: Michael Sierchio (kudzu_at_tenebras.com)
Date: 09/24/03
- Previous message: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:14.arp"
- In reply to: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:14.arp"
- Next in thread: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:14.arp"
- Reply: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:14.arp"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:10:31 -0700 To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Right. But static ARP means something different. It means
> that the APR table is frozen, but system will still reply
> to ARP requests for its addresses, which is not done if
> IFF_NOARP flag is set on an interface.
Okay, I may have been misusing the term. I meant *permanent* and
*manual* entries in the ARP table, via the arp command, and
disabling ARP on the interface.
That seems to work. What does your lexicon say for "static arp?"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:14.arp"
- In reply to: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:14.arp"
- Next in thread: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:14.arp"
- Reply: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:14.arp"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|