Re: EoL dates
From: Colin Percival (colin.percival_at_wadham.ox.ac.uk)
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 10:38:49 -0700 To: Colin Percival <email@example.com>, Kris Kennaway <firstname.lastname@example.org>
At 10:14 24/08/2003 -0700, I wrote:
> Either I'm missing your point, or you're missing my point. There are
> five release branches now which are "not officially supported", but I
> have yet to see any circumstance where they have, in fact, not been
> supported. If those branches were not being supported because people
> were too busy to support them, I'd understand perfectly; but as far as I
> can see, those branches *are* being supported.
Oops. As email@example.com has just pointed out to me, I didn't look far
enough; SA-03:01, :02, :03, :05, and :06 didn't have official patches for
the unsupported branches.
I'll go sit quietly in the corner now.
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "email@example.com"