Re: EoL dates

From: Colin Percival (colin.percival_at_wadham.ox.ac.uk)
Date: 08/24/03

  • Next message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: EoL dates"
    Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 10:38:49 -0700
    To: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
    
    

    At 10:14 24/08/2003 -0700, I wrote:
    > Either I'm missing your point, or you're missing my point. There are
    > five release branches now which are "not officially supported", but I
    > have yet to see any circumstance where they have, in fact, not been
    > supported. If those branches were not being supported because people
    > were too busy to support them, I'd understand perfectly; but as far as I
    > can see, those branches *are* being supported.

       Oops. As hawkeyd@visi.com has just pointed out to me, I didn't look far
    enough; SA-03:01, :02, :03, :05, and :06 didn't have official patches for
    the unsupported branches.

       I'll go sit quietly in the corner now.

    Colin Percival

    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: EoL dates"