Re: EoL dates
From: Colin Percival (colin.percival_at_wadham.ox.ac.uk)
Date: 08/24/03
- Previous message: Colin Percival: "Re: EoL dates"
- In reply to: Colin Percival: "Re: EoL dates"
- Next in thread: Kris Kennaway: "Re: EoL dates"
- Reply: Kris Kennaway: "Re: EoL dates"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 10:38:49 -0700 To: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
At 10:14 24/08/2003 -0700, I wrote:
> Either I'm missing your point, or you're missing my point. There are
> five release branches now which are "not officially supported", but I
> have yet to see any circumstance where they have, in fact, not been
> supported. If those branches were not being supported because people
> were too busy to support them, I'd understand perfectly; but as far as I
> can see, those branches *are* being supported.
Oops. As hawkeyd@visi.com has just pointed out to me, I didn't look far
enough; SA-03:01, :02, :03, :05, and :06 didn't have official patches for
the unsupported branches.
I'll go sit quietly in the corner now.
Colin Percival
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Colin Percival: "Re: EoL dates"
- In reply to: Colin Percival: "Re: EoL dates"
- Next in thread: Kris Kennaway: "Re: EoL dates"
- Reply: Kris Kennaway: "Re: EoL dates"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
