Re: EoL dates
From: Colin Percival (colin.percival_at_wadham.ox.ac.uk)
Date: 08/24/03
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: ibm fstack protector"
- In reply to: Kris Kennaway: "Re: EoL dates"
- Next in thread: Colin Percival: "Re: EoL dates"
- Reply: Colin Percival: "Re: EoL dates"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 10:14:31 -0700 To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk>
At 10:03 24/08/2003 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 06:45:50AM -0700, Colin Percival wrote:
> > Is there any reason why releases have EoL dates after only 12
> > months?
>
>They are supported by unpaid volunteers who have a limit to the amount
>of free time they can donate to the project.
Either I'm missing your point, or you're missing my point. There are
five release branches now which are "not officially supported", but I have
yet to see any circumstance where they have, in fact, not been
supported. If those branches were not being supported because people were
too busy to support them, I'd understand perfectly; but as far as I can
see, those branches *are* being supported.
Colin Percival
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: ibm fstack protector"
- In reply to: Kris Kennaway: "Re: EoL dates"
- Next in thread: Colin Percival: "Re: EoL dates"
- Reply: Colin Percival: "Re: EoL dates"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
