Re: EoL dates

From: Kris Kennaway (kris_at_obsecurity.org)
Date: 08/24/03

  • Next message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: ibm fstack protector"
    Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 10:03:54 -0700
    To: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk>
    
    
    

    On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 06:45:50AM -0700, Colin Percival wrote:
    > Is there any reason why releases have EoL dates after only 12
    > months?

    They are supported by unpaid volunteers who have a limit to the amount
    of free time they can donate to the project.

    Kris

    
    



  • Next message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: ibm fstack protector"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Global Const vs Public Const
      ... an eol language there's no point avoiding the eol keywords :-) ... reason to also change Global in bas modules to Public. ...
      (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)
    • EoL dates
      ... Is there any reason why releases have EoL dates after only 12 ... While it's clear that some sort of EoL is important, ... of any security advisories recently which weren't accompanied by patches ...
      (FreeBSD-Security)