Re: realpath(3) et al
From: Bruce M Simpson (bms_at_spc.org)
Date: 08/14/03
- Previous message: twig les: "Re: Certification (was RE: realpath(3) et al) - jumping to -advocacy"
- In reply to: Mike Hoskins: "Re: realpath(3) et al"
- Next in thread: Devon H. O'Dell: "RE: realpath(3) et al"
- Reply: Devon H. O'Dell: "RE: realpath(3) et al"
- Reply: Mike Hoskins: "Re: realpath(3) et al"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 21:19:23 +0100 To: Mike Hoskins <mike@adept.org>
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 06:06:32PM -0700, Mike Hoskins wrote:
> *sigh* i'd hoped the project was 'always' ongoing, and that sharing
> and/or integrating changes amongst the various BSD source trees would be
> commonplace. the fact that it's not clearly illustrates that our biggest
> enemey in the security game is ourselves. (by 'selves' i mean anyone who
> feels not sharing a security or bug fix is a good idea.)
I think it would rock if we had more people cross-pollinating the BSDs in
general. Security fixes are no exception. I am thinking in particular of
the non-executable stack stuff in OpenBSD.
BMS
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: twig les: "Re: Certification (was RE: realpath(3) et al) - jumping to -advocacy"
- In reply to: Mike Hoskins: "Re: realpath(3) et al"
- Next in thread: Devon H. O'Dell: "RE: realpath(3) et al"
- Reply: Devon H. O'Dell: "RE: realpath(3) et al"
- Reply: Mike Hoskins: "Re: realpath(3) et al"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]