Re: realpath(3) et al

From: Kris Kennaway (kris_at_obsecurity.org)
Date: 08/12/03

  • Next message: Devon H. O'Dell: "RE: realpath(3) et al"
    Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 13:48:04 -0700
    To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>, "Devon H. O'Dell" <dodell@sitetronics.com>, 'Jason Stone' <freebsd-security@dfmm.org>, security@freebsd.org, kris@FreeBSD.org
    
    
    

    On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 02:59:46PM -0500, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
    > On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 01:59:51PM +0200, Devon H. O'Dell wrote:
    > > In any case, IBM has a stack smashing protection patch for GCC 3.3 on
    > > FreeBSD 4.8 available at
    > > http://www.trl.ibm.com/projects/security/ssp/buildfreebsd.html (the
    > > description page is at http://www.trl.ibm.com/projects/security/ssp/). It
    > > currently works in the latest cvsupped source from 5.1 as well (I've built
    > > and tested it).
    >
    > http://www.research.ibm.com/trl/projects/security/ssp/ has the latest.
    > Yes, I'd like to see this in the base system as well. Our toolchain
    > in 5.x is calming down a bit, maybe the timing is getting ripe.
    >
    > I thought Kris looked into this before, but I don't recall what might
    > have ultimately stopped him from making the commits. cc:ing him in
    > case he has insight to share.

    The gcc maintainer (David O'Brien at the time) was unwilling to
    support the burden of an external gcc patch which would need to be
    re-integrated by him each time a new gcc version was imported.

    Instead, we agreed that the best solution was to make a port that uses
    this patch, which can be updated periodically as the SSP authors track
    new gcc releases. Neither of us followed through on this though.

    Kris

    
    



  • Next message: Devon H. O'Dell: "RE: realpath(3) et al"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Silent gcc 4.2.0 loop optimization bug with -O2
      ... gcc 4.2.1 snapshot provided by Kris a week back, compile stuff, and see ... So this doesn't seem to be fixed with Kris' snapshot. ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • Re: Curious about FreeBSD culture
      ... but it sounds like you have no reason to be afraid of ... > Kris> using gcc. ... That was never under debate...the original question was "is FreeBSD ...
      (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
    • RE: realpath(3) et al
      ... If you guys are too busy for maintaining this port, ... >> I thought Kris looked into this before, but I don't recall what might ... > support the burden of an external gcc patch which would need to be ...
      (FreeBSD-Security)
    • Lets use gcc-4.2, not 4.1 -- OpenMP
      ... Kris wrote: ... waiting on a few lagging maintainers to do their part), ... that in preparation for the gcc 4.x import into 7.0. ...
      (freebsd-current)