versions and up-to-date...
freebsd_at_critesclan.com
Date: 08/07/03
- Previous message: Peter Pentchev: "Re: Checking realpath file up to date"
- In reply to: Peter Pentchev: "Re: Checking realpath file up to date"
- Next in thread: Peter Pentchev: "Re: versions and up-to-date..."
- Reply: Peter Pentchev: "Re: versions and up-to-date..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Freebsd-Security@Freebsd. Org" <freebsd-security@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 09:49:42 -0500
This is not really a security related issue, but since we're talking about
releases and such, it kind of ties in. I do a CVSup every week, using the
"tag=." method. It is my assumption that I am getting the
latest-and-greatest version, so I'm on the bleeding edge of the 5.X system.
Is that correct? Further, I assume that as soon as any security patch is
available, I will get it as well, since I'm keeping up-to-date with the
latest-and-greatest.
So are my two assumptions correct?
Thanks muchly...
Lee
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Peter Pentchev
Sent: Thursday, 07 August 2003 07:57
To: Francisco Reyes
Cc: Jacques A. Vidrine; FreeBSD Security List
Subject: Re: Checking realpath file up to date
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:50:56AM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
>
> > Sounds like you cvsup'd RELENG_4, not RELENG_4_8.
>
>
> I went back to the handbook to read the difference between these two.
> If I understand correct RELENG_4 is basically the latest of the 4.X
> branch. The RELENG_# are basically only security patches for a particular
> 4.# release. Do I understand it correctly?
If you meant RELENG_4_# where you said RELENG_#, then yes, this is
correct. The RELENG_4 branch was not affected, since shortly after
FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE was out, a new version of realpath(3) was imported
into the tree, and it did not have this problem.
Thus, if you have a reasonably recent -STABLE (you seem to, since you
mention realpath.c rev. 1.9.2.2), there's nothing to fear - not for
this problem, at least.
G'luck,
Peter
-- Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@sbnd.net roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 I am the meaning of this sentence. _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Peter Pentchev: "Re: Checking realpath file up to date"
- In reply to: Peter Pentchev: "Re: Checking realpath file up to date"
- Next in thread: Peter Pentchev: "Re: versions and up-to-date..."
- Reply: Peter Pentchev: "Re: versions and up-to-date..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|