versions and up-to-date...

freebsd_at_critesclan.com
Date: 08/07/03

  • Next message: Peter Pentchev: "Re: versions and up-to-date..."
    To: "Freebsd-Security@Freebsd. Org" <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
    Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 09:49:42 -0500
    
    

    This is not really a security related issue, but since we're talking about
    releases and such, it kind of ties in. I do a CVSup every week, using the
    "tag=." method. It is my assumption that I am getting the
    latest-and-greatest version, so I'm on the bleeding edge of the 5.X system.
    Is that correct? Further, I assume that as soon as any security patch is
    available, I will get it as well, since I'm keeping up-to-date with the
    latest-and-greatest.

    So are my two assumptions correct?

    Thanks muchly...

    Lee

    -----Original Message-----
    From: owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org
    [mailto:owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Peter Pentchev
    Sent: Thursday, 07 August 2003 07:57
    To: Francisco Reyes
    Cc: Jacques A. Vidrine; FreeBSD Security List
    Subject: Re: Checking realpath file up to date

    On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:50:56AM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:
    > On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
    >
    > > Sounds like you cvsup'd RELENG_4, not RELENG_4_8.
    >
    >
    > I went back to the handbook to read the difference between these two.
    > If I understand correct RELENG_4 is basically the latest of the 4.X
    > branch. The RELENG_# are basically only security patches for a particular
    > 4.# release. Do I understand it correctly?

    If you meant RELENG_4_# where you said RELENG_#, then yes, this is
    correct. The RELENG_4 branch was not affected, since shortly after
    FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE was out, a new version of realpath(3) was imported
    into the tree, and it did not have this problem.

    Thus, if you have a reasonably recent -STABLE (you seem to, since you
    mention realpath.c rev. 1.9.2.2), there's nothing to fear - not for
    this problem, at least.

    G'luck,
    Peter

    --
    Peter Pentchev  roam@ringlet.net    roam@sbnd.net    roam@FreeBSD.org
    PGP key:        http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
    Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E  DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
    I am the meaning of this sentence.
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    

  • Next message: Peter Pentchev: "Re: versions and up-to-date..."

    Relevant Pages

    • [NEWS] Unsecure ELF RPATH In CVSup Packages Allows User Privilege Escalation
      ... Get your security news from a reliable source. ... Some dynamically linked binary builds of the CVSup package contain ... * cvsup-16.1h-43.i586.rpm by SUSE LINUX AG ...
      (Securiteam)
    • Re: PHP vulnerability and portupgrade
      ... > security advisory I run cvsup on the former, ... then use portupgrade to upgrade vulnerable ports. ... Maybe you need to edit stable-supfile to retrieve ...
      (freebsd-stable)
    • Re: OpenSSL workaround
      ... >> security announcement go by. ... What's the recommended way to patch this ... >> openssl hole? ... > You can cvsup to RELENG_4_6. ...
      (FreeBSD-Security)
    • Re: Sharepoint Used in Schools
      ... We use it at the College I work at for our Intranet. ... It ties in with active directory, so security is ...
      (microsoft.public.sharepoint.portalserver)
    • What is 5.2.1??
      ... using CVSup to buildworld with a tag of releng_5_2, ... date for security etc with 5.2. ... perform a CVSup and buildworld using the releng_5_2 tags right away. ...
      (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)

    Loading