Re: Removable media security in FreeBSD
From: Michael Sierchio (kudzu_at_tenebras.com)
Date: 06/10/03
- Previous message: Michael Sierchio: "Re: Removable media security in FreeBSD"
- In reply to: David Schultz: "Re: Removable media security in FreeBSD"
- Next in thread: David Schultz: "Re: Removable media security in FreeBSD"
- Reply: David Schultz: "Re: Removable media security in FreeBSD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 07:45:30 -0700 To: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG>
David Schultz wrote:
> FAT is somewhat less robust than UFS. ...
That is possibly the most subtle funny thing I have read
all day. "An orange crate is somewhat less robust than
a Humvee" is how I read that.
--
"Well," Brahma said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is no
wiser, but an intelligent man requires only two thousand five hundred."
- The Mahabharata
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Michael Sierchio: "Re: Removable media security in FreeBSD"
- In reply to: David Schultz: "Re: Removable media security in FreeBSD"
- Next in thread: David Schultz: "Re: Removable media security in FreeBSD"
- Reply: David Schultz: "Re: Removable media security in FreeBSD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]